Gist-content Questions in TOEFL Listening
Learn about Gist-content questions in TOEFL listening with an overview and practice question.
by Tim Martyn
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/307e3/307e33d4f6f5f310a136f2ea459a951bdae295be" alt="toefl-listening-gist-content_1 the human mind"
Overview
Gist-content questions test your ability to identify the overall content a lecture or conversation.
Here are some key points about Gist-content questions:
- They’re used with both lectures and conversations.
- They’re easy to identify because they use phrases like What are the speakers mainly discussing? or What is the lecture mainly about?
- The speaker(s) usually talk about several different things and/or go off on tangents, so you should eliminate answer choices that only relate to a small part of what you listened to.
- Some test takers find it useful to summarise the lecture or conversation in a single sentence before they look at the answer choices.
Practice question
Now it’s your turn to practise. Answer the Gist-content question below.
Feedback
Click below for the transcript.
OK, so no discussion of psychology would be complete without talking about Sigmund Freud. No doubt you’ve heard of him. He’s arguably the most famous and controversial figure in the history of psychology.
First, a bit of background. Freud was born in 1856 in what’s now the Czech Republic. His father was somewhat authoritarian and emotionally distant, whereas his mother, who he had a close relationship with, was more nurturing. When Freud was four, the family moved to Austria. He trained as a medical doctor at the University of Vienna, and then went on to develop what he called psychoanalysis. You’ve probably heard of it. It’s basically a method for understanding and treating mental illness by uncovering unconscious thoughts and desires.
As you may know, many Freudian terms, things like defense mechanism and Freudian slip, are widely recognized and have become integrated into our everyday language. But you may not know that his theories have been largely discredited. You see, Freud’s theories were mainly based on introspection, case studies and anecdotal evidence – not controlled experiments. Unlike modern psychological research, which relies on testable hypotheses, peer review, and results that can be reproduced by other researchers, Freud’s ideas were often vague and unfalsifiable. That’s an important term, actually. When I say unfalsifiable, I mean there was no clear way they could be tested or disproved.
One well-known concept that illustrates this point is the Freudian slip. Basically, Freud believed that these so-called slips of the tongue were not simple errors. He thought they were meaningful glimpses into a person’s unconscious desires and repressed thoughts. Let me give you an example. If someone accidentally says, “I’m so glad to beat you” instead of “I’m so glad to meet you”, Freudians would argue that this reveals a hidden competitive or aggressive impulse rather than being a simple linguistic mistake. The issue is that this interpretation isn’t falsifiable. You see, if a slip aligns with a person’s supposed unconscious desires, it’s considered proof of repressed thoughts. If it doesn’t align, then it’s simply dismissed as unimportant. This kind of reasoning is circular and doesn’t meet the criteria for scientific inquiry. You see what I mean?
Modern research into language processing and cognitive psychology suggests that slips of the tongue are better explained by the mechanics of speech production rather than unconscious repression. Speech errors often result from interference between similar sounds, words or grammatical structures in the brain. For example, a person might say “hold card cash” instead of “cold hard cash” because the brain processes speech sounds in overlapping patterns. So, do these errors indicate hidden desires? No, not at all. Instead, they reflect the complexities of linguistic encoding and retrieval.
Beyond Freudian slips, many of Freud’s broader theories don’t have empirical support. For instance, his ideas on childhood development have been widely discredited. The idea that early childhood experiences determine personality in such a rigid manner has not been supported by contemporary developmental psychology. Instead, research has shown that personality development is influenced by a range of genetic, environmental and social factors in ways that Freud’s model simply doesn’t account for.
What’s more, Freud’s theories were mostly based on his observations of a small and unrepresentative group of patients. During therapy, he could influence or shape the patients’ responses, making it hard to tell whether the conclusions were based on the patients’ actual experiences or Freud’s own opinions. This raises concerns about confirmation bias. What I mean is, Freud may have found what he expected to find because his methods didn’t allow for objective testing or other possible explanations.
Nevertheless, despite these shortcomings, Freud’s influence persists. As I mentioned earlier, terms like repression and defence mechanism have entered popular culture, and his general idea that the unconscious mind plays a role in behavior can even be seen in the themes, plots and characters of the novels we read, and the films and TV shows we watch. Today, psychology has largely moved beyond Freud’s framework, but there’s no doubt he’ll continue to be a household name for a long time to come.